http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/2009/06/victimized-by-jurisdiction-shopping/ Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:52:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/2009/06/victimized-by-jurisdiction-shopping/comment-page-1/#comment-13 Adam Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:47:56 +0000 http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/?p=966#comment-13 This doesn't make sense. Once a final judgment has been rendered in one court, generally a losing-party can't "venue-hunt" for a more sympathetic judge and jury over the same merits. It's called Issue (or Claim, I forget) Preclusion. This doesn’t make sense. Once a final judgment has been rendered in one court, generally a losing-party can’t “venue-hunt” for a more sympathetic judge and jury over the same merits. It’s called Issue (or Claim, I forget) Preclusion.

]]> http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/2009/06/victimized-by-jurisdiction-shopping/comment-page-1/#comment-4 P Weiss Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:12:27 +0000 http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/?p=966#comment-4 Plantiff should not be allowed to shop around and file same suit. Any judge that allows someone to do this should be investigated by the state. This is especially true if plantiff is a 'repeat offender'. The business owner should file a counter-suit for harrassment and seek a large sum, under RICO if possible, Plantiff should not be allowed to shop around and file same suit. Any judge that allows someone to do this should be investigated by the state. This is especially true if plantiff is a ‘repeat offender’. The business owner should file a counter-suit for harrassment and seek a large sum, under RICO if possible,

]]>