<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Faces of Lawsuit Abuse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 02:58:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Community swimming pool closes due to lawsuit by Earl Wheber</title>
		<link>http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/2009/12/lawsuit-closes-community-swimming-pool/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl Wheber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 02:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/?p=2665#comment-174</guid>
		<description>You are making a nobel effort here and telling the truth but nothing will change because of it because lawyers dominate all 3 branches of government as well as both major political parties and this is known as the legal caste.  A political approach is needed to get lawyers out of government before you will see any changes.  One of the most obvious indications of this is Obamas&#039; so-called health care reform where he has attack insurance companies but has refused to even consider the medical mal-practice crisis (doctors being sued and causing them to do unneeded expensive testing to try and protect them against lawsuits).  Of course the doctors insurance against medical mal-practice has gone way up so that, along with the expenses of the unecessary testing, is passed along to the patients.  Read bestseller book &quot;How to Avoid Probate&quot; by Norman Dacey (at your public libary) and the chapter on lawyers in the book!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are making a nobel effort here and telling the truth but nothing will change because of it because lawyers dominate all 3 branches of government as well as both major political parties and this is known as the legal caste.  A political approach is needed to get lawyers out of government before you will see any changes.  One of the most obvious indications of this is Obamas&#8217; so-called health care reform where he has attack insurance companies but has refused to even consider the medical mal-practice crisis (doctors being sued and causing them to do unneeded expensive testing to try and protect them against lawsuits).  Of course the doctors insurance against medical mal-practice has gone way up so that, along with the expenses of the unecessary testing, is passed along to the patients.  Read bestseller book &#8220;How to Avoid Probate&#8221; by Norman Dacey (at your public libary) and the chapter on lawyers in the book!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Community swimming pool closes due to lawsuit by Frank</title>
		<link>http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/2009/12/lawsuit-closes-community-swimming-pool/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/?p=2665#comment-167</guid>
		<description>It is being blamed on the political left by posters in here because it is a hard fact that whenever attempts are made legislatively to act against frivolous lawsuits, it is the elected officials hailing from the political left who, acting on special interest marching orders from the lawyers&#039; lobbyists that support them, roadblock such reform and make false claims that their actions are to protect the little guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is being blamed on the political left by posters in here because it is a hard fact that whenever attempts are made legislatively to act against frivolous lawsuits, it is the elected officials hailing from the political left who, acting on special interest marching orders from the lawyers&#8217; lobbyists that support them, roadblock such reform and make false claims that their actions are to protect the little guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All My Assets for a Slip and Fall by Slip and fall settlements</title>
		<link>http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/2009/12/all-my-assets-for-a-slip-and-fall/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Slip and fall settlements</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/?p=2834#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Surely if she was walking backwards, the fault lies with her and you should have no liability</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely if she was walking backwards, the fault lies with her and you should have no liability</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Woman claims repair notices caused emotional damage, sues for $500K by Paul</title>
		<link>http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/2009/12/woman-claims-repair-notices-caused-emotional-damage-sues-for-500k/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/?p=2649#comment-162</guid>
		<description>When you need to make repairs and improvements on your properties, you either need to wait until something breaks and you are requested to make the repairs, or you need to declare the apartment/property &quot;no longer rentable&quot;, move the tenant out, and then make all your repairs while it is vacant...not the most efficient or profitable way, but you will avoid the weenie-whiners like Juskys had to deal with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you need to make repairs and improvements on your properties, you either need to wait until something breaks and you are requested to make the repairs, or you need to declare the apartment/property &#8220;no longer rentable&#8221;, move the tenant out, and then make all your repairs while it is vacant&#8230;not the most efficient or profitable way, but you will avoid the weenie-whiners like Juskys had to deal with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sued for Saving Two Lives? by Pierre</title>
		<link>http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/2009/12/sued-for-saving-two-lives/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/?p=2828#comment-160</guid>
		<description>dont worry, a nice dose of a great depression will make people rethink the real value&#039;s in life</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dont worry, a nice dose of a great depression will make people rethink the real value&#8217;s in life</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michigan man’s 24th lawsuit threatens family business by John Corey</title>
		<link>http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/2009/12/michigan-man%e2%80%99s-24th-lawsuit-threatens-family-business/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>John Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/?p=2671#comment-159</guid>
		<description>After 23 suits it is clear this is just legal stalking to harrass. Singer should file suit for all costs and damages associated with all 23 suits. I think he has a good shot at recoverery with 23 failed pointless suits filed against him by the same party. Would definately make this false filer take notice and put them on the defense and out of pocket for a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After 23 suits it is clear this is just legal stalking to harrass. Singer should file suit for all costs and damages associated with all 23 suits. I think he has a good shot at recoverery with 23 failed pointless suits filed against him by the same party. Would definately make this false filer take notice and put them on the defense and out of pocket for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Community swimming pool closes due to lawsuit by Eric Rehwaldt</title>
		<link>http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/2009/12/lawsuit-closes-community-swimming-pool/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Rehwaldt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/?p=2665#comment-156</guid>
		<description>Lawyers are destroying our country. Let&#039;s face facts.....this country was founded upon GREED, plain and simple. We took it from the folks that lived here and then told them they were all FREE Americans with rights and laws. As we yelled FREEDOM, we chained a couple milion people and splitt their families to weaken them. We have a pattern of taking whatever we want from whomever we want it from. Read the particulars of the Treaty of Guadalupe, signed between USA and Mexico in 1848. We added 66% to our country. They gladly signed.....at gun point and the threat we would destroy their new government and Mexico city, AGAIN. Now we are screwing OURSELVES and we have the gall to say  &quot;oh gosh, it&#039;s these damn lawyers&quot; Without a million greedy pigs looking for a free lunch, we have NO frivolous lawsuits. So if you want to blame someone, start like I did, by looking at the face in the mirror.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawyers are destroying our country. Let&#8217;s face facts&#8230;..this country was founded upon GREED, plain and simple. We took it from the folks that lived here and then told them they were all FREE Americans with rights and laws. As we yelled FREEDOM, we chained a couple milion people and splitt their families to weaken them. We have a pattern of taking whatever we want from whomever we want it from. Read the particulars of the Treaty of Guadalupe, signed between USA and Mexico in 1848. We added 66% to our country. They gladly signed&#8230;..at gun point and the threat we would destroy their new government and Mexico city, AGAIN. Now we are screwing OURSELVES and we have the gall to say  &#8220;oh gosh, it&#8217;s these damn lawyers&#8221; Without a million greedy pigs looking for a free lunch, we have NO frivolous lawsuits. So if you want to blame someone, start like I did, by looking at the face in the mirror.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michigan man’s 24th lawsuit threatens family business by John Fitzpatrick</title>
		<link>http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/2009/12/michigan-man%e2%80%99s-24th-lawsuit-threatens-family-business/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>John Fitzpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/?p=2671#comment-150</guid>
		<description>While these gentlemen paint a sympathetic picture, I have to wonder why they had so much expense since prudent businessmen buy liability insurance to defend them.  Also, according to the Michigan Legislature&#039;s website, that state&#039;s law includes: &quot;600.2591 Frivolous civil action or defense to civil action; awarding costs and fees to prevailing party; definitions.

Sec. 2591.

(1) Upon motion of any party, if a court finds that a civil action or defense to a civil action was frivolous, the court that conducts the civil action shall award to the prevailing party the costs and fees incurred by that party in connection with the civil action by assessing the costs and fees against the nonprevailing party and their attorney.&quot;  If so, they have a remedy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While these gentlemen paint a sympathetic picture, I have to wonder why they had so much expense since prudent businessmen buy liability insurance to defend them.  Also, according to the Michigan Legislature&#8217;s website, that state&#8217;s law includes: &#8220;600.2591 Frivolous civil action or defense to civil action; awarding costs and fees to prevailing party; definitions.</p>
<p>Sec. 2591.</p>
<p>(1) Upon motion of any party, if a court finds that a civil action or defense to a civil action was frivolous, the court that conducts the civil action shall award to the prevailing party the costs and fees incurred by that party in connection with the civil action by assessing the costs and fees against the nonprevailing party and their attorney.&#8221;  If so, they have a remedy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michigan man’s 24th lawsuit threatens family business by ZORIADA</title>
		<link>http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/2009/12/michigan-man%e2%80%99s-24th-lawsuit-threatens-family-business/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>ZORIADA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/?p=2671#comment-149</guid>
		<description>I HAVE THE OPPOSITE PROBLEM. I CONTRACTED WITH AN ATTORNEY IN FORT LAUDERDALE TO REPRESENT MEI A LAWSUIT AND TOLD HIM HE COULDN&#039;T EXCEED $5000 IN LEGAL FEELS. AFTER 6 WEEKS HE HANDED ME A BILL FOR $13,000 AND I ENDED HAVING TO SETTLE MY LAWSUIT ON MY OWN. I REFUSED TO PAY ANYTHING OVER THE $5000 I GAVE HIM IN RETAINER AND BEACUSE HE IS AN ATTORNEY,HE FILES MOTIONS AND DEFAULTS AND LIES TO JUDGES AND EVEN HAD A PATIENT OF MINE SIGN A FALSE AFFIDAVIT AGAINST ME WHICH THE PATIENT ADMITTED &quot;I DIDN&#039;T READ WHAT HE PUT IN FRONT OF ME&quot;A AND STILL I CAN&#039;T HIS CASE AGAINST ME DISMISSED EVEN THOUGH I SIGNED NO CONTRACT WITH HIM NOR AGREED TO HIS EXORBITANT COSTS. I HAVE ALREADY SPENT IN EXCESS OF $2,500 BUT UNTIL I CAN&#039;T I WON&#039;T PAY THIS BUZZARD LOW LIFE A DIME.
THE LEGAL SYSTEM NEEDS TO POLICE ITSELF TO RID ITSELF OF THE BAD APPLES LIKE THIS GUY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I HAVE THE OPPOSITE PROBLEM. I CONTRACTED WITH AN ATTORNEY IN FORT LAUDERDALE TO REPRESENT MEI A LAWSUIT AND TOLD HIM HE COULDN&#8217;T EXCEED $5000 IN LEGAL FEELS. AFTER 6 WEEKS HE HANDED ME A BILL FOR $13,000 AND I ENDED HAVING TO SETTLE MY LAWSUIT ON MY OWN. I REFUSED TO PAY ANYTHING OVER THE $5000 I GAVE HIM IN RETAINER AND BEACUSE HE IS AN ATTORNEY,HE FILES MOTIONS AND DEFAULTS AND LIES TO JUDGES AND EVEN HAD A PATIENT OF MINE SIGN A FALSE AFFIDAVIT AGAINST ME WHICH THE PATIENT ADMITTED &#8220;I DIDN&#8217;T READ WHAT HE PUT IN FRONT OF ME&#8221;A AND STILL I CAN&#8217;T HIS CASE AGAINST ME DISMISSED EVEN THOUGH I SIGNED NO CONTRACT WITH HIM NOR AGREED TO HIS EXORBITANT COSTS. I HAVE ALREADY SPENT IN EXCESS OF $2,500 BUT UNTIL I CAN&#8217;T I WON&#8217;T PAY THIS BUZZARD LOW LIFE A DIME.<br />
THE LEGAL SYSTEM NEEDS TO POLICE ITSELF TO RID ITSELF OF THE BAD APPLES LIKE THIS GUY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michigan man’s 24th lawsuit threatens family business by Ross Newsom</title>
		<link>http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/2009/12/michigan-man%e2%80%99s-24th-lawsuit-threatens-family-business/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Newsom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/?p=2671#comment-148</guid>
		<description>I  wil keep you in my prayers and keep strong in this time-Ross</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  wil keep you in my prayers and keep strong in this time-Ross</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
